We're Not in Kansas Anymore Dodo

"We're Not in Kansas Anymore, Dodo"

A High school Term Paper Concerning the Effects of Long-Term Cell Phone Use,

And the Potential Government Cover-up.

By:

Samantha M. Schmitz, 11th Grade, age 17 1/2 years old.

February 18th, 2015

The focus of this research paper is to reveal truth on the long-term effects on cell phone usage, and the possibility that the government is hiding that truth from us as American citizens.

Cell phones undoubtedly do carry many exciting advantages with them, that's for certain. We can stay in touch with our long lost relatives, check to see if there will be snow so we can determine if we will go out on the road, keep updated on how our family is doing throughout the day, listen to uplifting and inspiring music that makes us feel good, blog, take pictures, meet our future spouse, or just downright have something to do. These are just a handful of the reasons people like having their cell phones. And let's not be modest about our feelings on the appearance of the iPhone either. We like it because it looks modern, slick, and let's face it, cool. We may even go a step further to say that not only are cell phones cool and fun, but they can also be used for great things, like building a business, sharing the Gospel, helping a discouraged soul...and the possibilities continue. And that can happen almost anywhere in the world.

But before we go skipping gleefully down on the yellow brick road of life and singing, "We're off to see the Wizard! The wonderful wizard of Oz!" as we go to buy the newest and next iPhone; let's face some of the real disadvantages of cell phones.

It has been discovered that the radiation from our cell phones are known to suppress the brain's serotonin and dopamine levels (Policano, Ariel). Serotonin is the chemical in each person's brain that helps them calm down and fall asleep at night. So without it working properly, that can lead to problems, such has brain over-stimulation, insomnia, anxiousness, and sleeplessness.

The other chemical Policano mentioned, dopamine, is also a chemical that is in each person's brain and when one has the correct percentage of dopamine, (you could call a 'happy medium' percentage of it), it keeps you happy and thinking clearly throughout the day. Dr. Krukowski (a P.H.D. that now practices naturopath) states that what happens when the dopamine is just a little bit off, either too high or too low, is it has the opposite effect and can cause depression, anxiety, and even hallucinations. So, you can see, even if those two things were the only side effects that one received from excessive cell phone use, this gives weight to the concept that cell phones can in fact be harmful to one's health. Let's first look at some other interesting facts before we think that is all...for we're only revealing the tip of the ice berg in reality.

Another disadvantage, Dr. Gordon says, "the human body is an electrical mechanism...exposure to powerful EMF (electromagnetic force) fields throws a wrench into the works. Cells die, cancerous ones multiply, nerves and muscles twang, the serotonin/melatonin balance is upset, bringing on depression, anger, even suicide." (Gordon).

Most have heard of the most common disadvantage of cell phone usage, cancer. A study done by the Swedish Researchers is an eye-opener on this subject.

"A form of deadly cancer, known as glioma has been appearing more often in people who have been using mobile phones for more than 25 years...” (Swedish Researchers).

"...In a 2012 study, Dr. Gabriel Zada, a neurosurgeon at the University of Southern California's Keck School of Medicine, who was not involved in Hardell's study, found that rates of malignant tumors in parts of the brain closest to where people hold their cell phones rose significantly in California from 1992 to 2006.

"Tiffany Frantz, a Pennsylvania young lady who was diagnosed in 2011 with breast cancer, according to Examiner.com. Frantz said her and her mother Traci were stunned when she received the diagnosis because she was a healthy 21-year-old at the time that had no family history of the disease. The one (observation) that stood out was that Tiffany carried her cell phone in her bra every day for four years.

Sadly, because Tiffany had used her cell phone for so long, the cancer spread throughout her entire body. Her hip, spine, pelvic bone, ribs and skull were also cancerous. After simply keeping her cell phone in her bra for four years! Her cancer from using her cell phone didn't take twenty years to see results (like some "experts" will say), it only took four years. (Swedish Researchers).

Another disadvantageous side effect to cell phones, researcher Ariel Policano said that in 1996 a man named Wolke found that 25,000 mw/m2, (mw is a measurement of radiation intensity level in the air), “affected calcium concentration in heart cells” (Policano).

Even though we now know supposed disadvantageous side effects from using cell phones, that won't keep us from staying in touch, texting, and talking to our friends. Cell phones can be useful and they aren’t necessarily all bad, but the harmful effect that they have on our bodies is something of which we should be aware.

There is also something else we should consider as we embark on this journey to compile a fully accurate view of cell phones. And that’s what most people leave out when they are trying to convince their audience to believe their view on the subject…the other side of the story.

To use a little analogy from The Wizard of Oz, not everyone thought that the Wizard was deceiving them from behind his curtain. In fact, most thought that whenever the Wizard spoke that it was 100% truth, and they took his word for it. It was only a tiny minority that even questioned the Wizard’s authority, much less his character.

In reality, only a small percentage of people in America truly believe that cell phones could even be slightly harmful, much less dangerous. I’ve decided to show you a little bit of the majority’s thinking on the subject of cell phones, that way we have a well-rounded collection of information to pick and choose from. Hopefully this will allow us to better define what is true and versus mere opinion.

So let’s take a journey down the yellow brick road, looking at things from the majority's point of view. There's an interesting reoccurring theme I recognized that the "experts" have in their articles on cell phone radiation. Pay close attention to the theme of each article below:

1) "Most published analyses from this study have shown no significant increases in brain or central nervous system cancers related to higher amounts of cell phone use. One recent analysis showed a statistically significant, albeit modest, increase in the risk of glioma among the small portion of study participants who spent the most total time on cell phone calls. However, the researchers considered this finding inconclusive because they felt that the amount of use reported by some respondents was unlikely..." (Interphone Study, an international cell phone research project).

2) "...found that self reported cell phone use was not associated with an increased risk of glioma..." (Million Women Study, UK).

3) "early case-control study in the United States was unable to demonstrate a relationship between cell phone use and glioma..." (United States study).

4) "Sweden did not find an increase risk of brain cancer among people between the ages of 20 and 69." (Sweden study).

And there’s many more stats (government stats) that claim cell phones are harmless, and that there’s no association between cancer and cell phones. After doing much research on what the U.S. government says about cell phones, I then went to the other extreme and researched Kevin Trudeau, the anti-government, famous government conspiracy guy. Some interesting things I learned from his show made my spine tingle…

“In men, cell phone radiation messes up the sperm, which produces a retard child…cell phone radiation has also known to lower men’s sexual desire for women...Wireless devices caused sperm damage in mice…During World War II and other wars, American soldiers would walk in front of the radar (radiation) and literally blow up”. (Kevin Trudeau & Dr. Fred Van Liew).

Something else that made a whole lot of sense to me, and yet eye-opening as well, was the microwave reality. Trudeau explained that microwaves heat up food by agitating water, sugar and fat. He went on to say, “Guess what our bodies are made up of now? Water, Fat, and sugar.” (Kevin Trudeau).

Even if you are a person like me, that tries to steer clear from sugar and sugar cane, each of our bodies still has natural sugars regardless. And so, when we humans, are made of the three elements that cook in a radiation atmosphere, we are living day-to-day surrounded by electromagnetic waves from cell phones, tablets, wireless devices, Bluetooth devices, cell phone towers, etc., it’s like we are the piece of food, being cooked in a gigantic microwave. As I warned you in the beginning, “We’re not in Kansas anymore, Dodo!”

Kansas changed long ago. Folks are clueless to that fact, and they continue about their busy lives, thinking that Kansas hasn’t changed at all. But we’ve entered a whole new era now…we’re in Oz, land of the microwave oven.

As Trudeau wisely pointed out, “You can’t uncook a cooked hotdog.” So true! All the more reason to see how we can begin to protect ourselves from being further ‘cooked,’ since there is no reversing the damage already done, but only preventing further damage from occurring.

As I was doing more research on cell phone radiation, and government cover-up, I read,

“The Whistle Blower Dr. George Carlo AKA is considered the Jeffrey Wigand of the cell world (Wigland was the Tobacco

Industry whistle blower). When hired by the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association to head up their

$28 million research program, he found a connection between brain cancer deaths and cell phones. After he went

public he was fired. He's since coauthored several books including Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age.

He continues to lecture about risks around cell phones and participated in the French documentary

Cell Phone War.” (McNally).

Along with Dr. Carlo’s discovery in McNally’s article, there have been several countries worldwide that have discovered alarming evidence that there is at least a link between cell phones and cancer. The countries that participated in the Interphone project, and posted their results about the link between cell phones and cancer were, Canada, Australia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, New Zealand, Norway, Japan, Sweden, and the UK. But not the U.S.

Although the article I was reading claimed at the very end, that there is still no “conclusive evidence”, I found several alarming posts that were made by each individual country that had this Interphone study done. To quote just a few,

A) “Jan 2007. The Scandavian report, Mobile phone use and risk of glioma in 5 North European countries was co-authored

by the Finnish scientist Anna Lahkola. The report cited evidence that ‘cell phone users of more than 10 years had an

increase in glioma tumors on the side of the head where the cell phone was placed.’ (Glioma is the most common type of brain tumor )’”

B) “April 2008. The Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection issued a

warning on children using mobile phones, mentioning health hazards ranging from ADHD, diminished learning and cognitive abilities leading to brain tumors and overall degeneration of the brain.” (McNally).

So the scientists and pro-government lobbyists, after reading all of this, still conclude that there is “no conclusive evidence” that cell phones cause cancer? Or that there’s even the possibility of a link between the two? What else on earth are they looking for?.. A sign from heaven? Ten thousand people to die from cell phone radiation, and then they will admit it? Either all the people that are dying, it is just a fluke, or the government is hiding something from us. Do U.S. government officials really think they can hide all evidence of people dying from increased radiation in the atmosphere? Do they think we, the citizens of the United States of America, are stupid? Or that we the people are projects of science on which experimented? Even to the point of death?

Could it be possible that the government would lie to us? Or better yet, what proof do we have that they would tell us the truth in the first place?

Even an article I found that was trying to defend the safety of cell phones, referenced this story,

“Earlier this winter, I met an investment banker who was diagnosed with a brain tumor five years ago. He’s a managing director at a top Wall Street firm, and I was put in touch with him through a colleague who knew I was writing a story about the potential dangers of cell-phone radiation. He agreed to talk with me only if his name wasn’t used, so I’ll call him Jim. He explained that the tumor was located just behind his right ear and was not immediately fatal–the five-year survival rate is about 70 percent. He was 35 years old at the time of his diagnosis and immediately suspected it was the result of his intense cell-phone usage. “Not for nothing,” he said, “but in investment banking we’ve been using cell phones since 1992, back when they were the Gordon-Gekko-on-the-beach kind of phone.” When Jim asked his neurosurgeon, who was on the staff of a major medical center in Manhattan, about the possibility of a cell-phone-induced tumor, the doctor responded that in fact he was seeing more and more of such cases–young, relatively healthy businessmen who had long used their phones obsessively. He said he believed the industry had discredited studies showing there is a risk from cell phones. “I got a sense that he was pissed off,” Jim told me. A handful of Jim’s colleagues had already died from brain cancer; the more reports he encountered of young finance guys developing tumors, the more certain he felt that it wasn’t a coincidence. “I knew four or five people just at my firm who got tumors,” Jim says. “Each time, people ask the question. I hear it in the hallways.” (Ketcham).

If there are all these documented cases of people getting tumors, then why isn’t the government admitting that there could be a link between cancer and cell phones? Why isn’t the government and the cell phone industry at least warning us that when we pick up that iPhone at Walmart, we are “on our own, baby”! Notice how you will never ever find a government article that will claim that cell phones are safe…only that there is “no conclusive evidence.” Well, after reading this man’s story, I’m not sure what you call better evidence then real live people dying from radiation!?? Is doing “controlled” research in a lab, experimenting on rats really carry more weight than real live human beings that are suffering and dying because of the industry’s lack of integrity? Apparently to some people. You may be thinking, if cell phones are so bad, then why don’t they carry warnings telling us that risks of cell phone usage?

“Barnidge: Why don't cell phones carry warnings?

THE SURGICAL procedure is called a craniotomy, and Alan Marks says it is as frightening as it sounds. Nineteen months ago, his skull was opened to remove a golf ball-sized malignant tumor from the right frontal lobe of his brain in a seven-hour operation at UCSF Medical Center.

It had been growing there for years, he was told, before announcing itself May 6, 2008. That's when he had a seizure, flailing his arms, uttering unintelligible sounds and terrifying his wife, Ellie.

The Lafayette resident said he knows what caused it: extensive cell phone use.

Ellie and son Zack first wondered about the connection, researching Alan's condition online. She contacted international authorities on the correlation between cell phones and cancer, including Drs. Lennart Hardell of Sweden and Elihu Richter of Israel, who reviewed her husband's medical and cell phone history.

"They said absolutely, without a doubt, there is a connection," Ellie said.

Other experts will debate the conclusion, nonbelievers will dismiss it and those of us with no strong opinion will scratch our chins. In fact, we did that in this space 12 days ago, wondering about the dangers of the electromagnetic radiation that cell phones emit.

Alan and Ellie say we should be concerned. They have testified before Congress and the Maine House of Representatives, appeared on the "Dr. Oz Show" and national network newscasts. Numerous authorities share their opinion: Cell phones should come with a warning.

Alan, a 58-year-old real estate broker, said he used to be glued to his cell phone — more than an hour day, on average, for more than 20 years — always with the receiver tucked against his right ear. That last part is key, he said: proximity to the brain. Cell phones can be safe if they are kept at a distance — on speakerphone or headset.

"If there had been a warning 27 years ago, I still would have used a cell phone," he said, "but I wouldn't have put it to my head. That's the issue. People are killing themselves without being warned."

Because children and teens have thinner skulls, they are even more susceptible to microwave penetration, according to Cindy Sage. She is the co-editor of the BioInitiative Report, a study compiled by 14 doctors and health experts who analyzed cell phone dangers. An adult who uses a cell phone for 10 years or more has double the normal risk for malignant brain tumor. For those who start using cell phones as teenagers, the risk is five times as much, she said. The question that you're asking is the same one Ellie Marks asked: Why doesn't the government require warning labels?

That was why she appeared before the U.S. House of Representatives in 2008, at the invitation of Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, where she was stunned to learn Congress had not addressed this issue since 1997.The 1997 standards, still in effect, are based on thermal heating — the amount of energy required to burn human tissue. Radio frequency and microwave radiation can have major effects without heating anything.

"Not much came out of the hearing," Ellie said. "But our government knows there's a problem. And the industry knows it, too."

Cell phone manufacturers' only acknowledgment appears in fine print buried deep in owners guides. The iPhone 3G advises users to keep the device at least five-eighths of an inch from their bodies; the BlackBerry 8300 says it should be 0.98 inches away.

“Why,” Alan asks, “aren't the warnings printed on the box? People will still buy them," he said. "They'll just use them more responsibly."

Major organizations such as the National Cancer Institute and the World Health Organization have declined to press the issue. They say there is no definitive evidence of a health threat, but don't tell that to Ellie.

"I've been contacted by hundreds of people with brain tumors," she said, "and they're all convinced it was because of cell phones."

Finland, Israel and France have guidelines for cell phone use. State Sen. Mark Leno, D-San Francisco, wants to do the same in California. San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom has urged that cell phone packaging print radiation absorption levels "as large as the price."

Meanwhile, Alan Marks has returned to work at Alain Pinel Realtors, painfully aware that his tumor could return. He occasionally is reminded of his cognitive deficits — lapses in concentration and difficulty conveying his thoughts — but he has no difficulty expounding on one topic.

"It bothers me to see people putting cell phones to their heads," he said. "They don't know what they're doing.” (Tom Barnidge).

Apparently, even after reading story upon story like Alan's, the government is still sure that there is "no conclusive evidence." To help us get more of a bird’s eye view, let’s look back at history. History often repeats itself, and so looking back to see how the government has “fibbed” to us in the past is a good way to evaluate their actions, or lack thereof, in the present.

Let’s start by taking a little trip back in time to 1981. Thirty-three years ago, to the Big Tobacco time. Let’s begin by seeing if there are any parallels at all with how the Big Tobacco handled things and how the cell phone industry is handling things at the present. Let’s take a look at an article put out (not by the government) by the Reason Foundation:

“The industry's strategy, as Tobacco Institute Vice President Fred Panzer put it in a 1972 memo, was "creating doubt about the health charge without actually denying it." Company officials steadfastly maintained that the case against smoking was not conclusive, and it soon became clear that no amount of evidence would sway them from that position.”

“As late as 1985, R.J. Reynolds ran misleading ads suggesting that a large epidemiological study had NOT FOUND EVIDENCE OF A LINK between smoking and heart disease.” (Sullum). Hmmm, no evidence…no link…sounding familiar?

In less than four years, Dr. Belpomme has questioned and examined clinically more than 1,000 electro hypersensitivity (EHS) – self reported patients. These are real sick persons who are in a pre-Alzheimer’s state. Canada’s safety code recognizes heating of tissues. What is the most conclusive scientific proof of biological effects? : Animal experiments (psychological explanations for their afflictions cannot be attributed to animals) and biological tests of electro sensitive persons which indicate a pre-Alzheimer’s state. These tests include:

- Brain imagery showing vascular hypo perfusion in the area of the brain (the limbic system) where Alzheimer’s starts
- 2-10 times higher levels of histamine in the blood.
- Detection of other markers of the opening of the blood brain barrier.
- Higher levels of auto-antibodies against O- myelin and / or stress proteins
- Decrease in the production of melatonin in 24h urine

These indications are objective and show the same biological anomalies as found in animals exposed to EMF.

What can we do? Treat these sick persons with natural anti-inflammatory products and anti-histamine medications and anti-oxidants; correct the deficit in vitamins and oligo elements to avoid Alzheimer’s. The sick persons are partially reimbursed by the French system, but these medicines are not recognized as specifically for treating electro sensitive persons, only for their biological or clinical properties. More and more electro sensitive persons are being recognized as handicapped.

We must take daily measures to protect ourselves: never use a cell phone for more than 20 minutes a day, in sequences of 6-minute calls. Limit use of cell phones by children and adolescents. Ban cell phones before age 12. Pregnant women should use cell phones as little as possible to protect the very vulnerable fetus. (http://mieuxprevenir.blogspot.com/2014/08/the-correlation-between-cell-phone-use.html)

Wow! This is definitely disturbing, but the most intriguing of all the articles yet that supports the formulating possibility that the government is hiding something from us, is this one, by health fanatic, Meris:

                    “Cell Phone Radiation Brain Cancer Cover Up Exposed . UPDATED 19 May 2014 in view of the latest study showing that using a cell phone 30 minutes a day over a minimum of 5 years doubles, even triples the risk for brain tumors.
                    Mobiles 'cooking the brain'; brain tumors become children’s number one killer illness; and leaked industry memo admits 'war gaming' the science.
                    Seek truth from facts with former senior White House adviser Devra Davis, Storyleak editor Anthony Gucciardi, 'cell phone survivor' Bret Bocook, Microwave News editor Louis Slesin, top radiation biologist Dariusz Leszczynski, and Ellie Marks, whose husband Alan is suing the industry for his brain tumor. Think of our children. Cell phone users have a 290% increased risk of brain tumors. The younger children begin using a cell phone, the higher the risk. In the West, brain tumors have overtaken leukemia as the number one child killer illness.

This is a very interesting interview panel on air on Meris’s blog. (2b)

RT: My name's Daniel Bushell. Class action lawsuits filed against cell phone manufacturers. Coming up…

Announcer: Insurers refuse public liability for cell phones. The warning buried deep inside your mobile. And the next 'casualty catastrophe' after tobacco and asbestos.

Keith Philips, brain tumor survivor: I would hold my cell phone here and the tumor was right there.

Stuart Cobb, brain tumor survivor: I always held it on my right side, right here. The industry should have put these warnings on these phones a long time ago.

RT: Professor Dariusz Leszczynski is one of the world's leading radiation biologists, and brave. He knew phone manufacturers would try to end his career for printing groundbreaking research, proving cell phones do cause biological damage.

Professor Leszczynski joins us, great to see you. How did the industry react?

Prof. Dariusz Leszczynski, Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Finland: So far I think I didn’t experience any smear campaign. But in my case it was just that the industry used their influence to prevent funding of my research projects.

RT: But studies like Professor Leszczynski’s now allow top neurosurgeons to issue a stark cell phone warning.

Dr. Keith Black, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center neurosurgeon: It's essentially cooking the brain.

RT: Ellie Marks' husband Alan suffered serious memory loss after years of using a mobile. At 2am one night he had a massive seizure. Surgeons found a tumor the size of a golf ball right where he held the phone. Ellie, thank you so much for joining us. Why are you and so many others suing the industry?

Ellie Marks, wife of brain tumor victim: There’s many many many others that are already deceased from this and are dying from this, younger than my husband. Some as young as 28 who are deceased and their neurosurgeons actually told them that it was probably their cell phone use.

We had about 20 cities and states that wanted to legislate as San Francisco had and they were all threatened with lawsuits by this industry.

RT: This is a photo of Bret Bocook's brain. The top quarter responsible for body balance has had to be removed after surgeons found this vast tumor right where he held the phone. A US national rowing champion, now he can barely move.

Bret, great to speak to you, tell us about the class action lawsuit against the phone industry.

Bret Bocook, brain tumor victim: The only way you can educate the public against big business is through lawsuits. That was how they did it with smoking. It was not until the District Attorneys in the United States got involved and sued the cigarette industry that they actually had a huge settlement, had to pay hundreds of millions of dollars for public education as to the dangers of smoking. That’s what’s going to happen with cell phones. It’s just unequivocal categorical that these things cause cancer. And also, they don’t want you to know that. This is on the same trajectory as smoking. Because if you look at smoking in the '60s they had doctors coming on TV and saying 'Hey, smoke Marlboro, smoke this brand, because it's good for your cough.'

Camel cigarette commercial: And see how well Camels agree with your throat!

The Flintstones cigarette commercial: Winston, America's best selling best tasting filtered cigarette!

Bret Bocook, brain tumor victim: And more dangerous for children, because their skulls are a lot thinner. At least you can’t buy cigarettes unless you’re 18. But even a five-year-old can go and buy a phone.

RT: For phone manufacturers young children are targets. There are now working cell phones even for babies.

PCMag phone review: The glowPhone is for kids maybe five to eight and the flyPhone is for tweens.

RT: Samantha Miller's funeral was on her 18th birthday. Phone use through childhood first gave her headaches, reports the Daily Mail, then the brain tumor that killed her. In the West, brain tumors have overtaken leukemia, notes Senator Lyn Allison, as the number one child killer illness.

But doctors warn that's the tip of the iceberg. Clinical studies find young men who keep phones in their pockets have much lower chances of producing offspring, while women often store them on their chest.

Tiffany Frantz, breast cancer victim: I would just tuck it into my bra.

RT: Tiffany Frantz got breast cancer aged just 21, right where since childhood she's stored her phone.
These spots mark the areas of Donna Jaynes' cancer. Her doctors call this a ‘new breed of distribution’ that exactly matches where women keep their phone.

Dr. John West, Chairman, Breast Care Center: It’s a very unusual pattern where these multiple small cancers were confined to the upper inner aspect of the breast, I’ve never seen anything quite like this.

RT: This is a radiation detector, in normal surroundings around 30 microvolts/meter (µV/m). Microwave ovens reach 800 µV/m. Wi-Fi routers use the same radiation technology. Loading a film on a tablet PC reaches 2,000 µV/m. Some of the world's best selling smartphones register over a thousand times above normal levels.

Insurers have in fact stopped covering cell phone manufacturers for public health. Insurance firms privately call cell phones the next public ‘casualty catastrophe’ after asbestos and cigarettes. Phone manufacturers have now quietly inserted a legal disclaimer. On iPhones you have to go to Settings, General, About, at the bottom scroll down to Legal and at the end – RF Exposure, Radiofrequency Exposure. Unlike most pages, the small print here can't be enlarged, but it reads: ‘Carry iPhone at least 10mm away from your body’

At the same time the industry says all its studies show phones are perfectly safe. Thomas Wheeler, CTIA phone lobby head: Radio waves from cellular phones are safe.

RT: A 'conflict of interest' Harvard ethics professor Lawrence Lessig calls industry paid studies, which consistently conclude phone radiation is harmless. Independent scientists meanwhile overwhelmingly find the most serious problems, from DNA damage to three times lower sperm counts, 290% more brain tumors, autism and birth defects.

Former senior White House advisor and leading epidemiologist Dr. Devra Davis has testified to Senate on the subject she joins us, great to see you. How do you explain the completely opposite findings between industry and independent studies?

Dr. Devra Davis, author of Disconnect: Anytime there was independent research, what industry would do was three things: first they would go attack the scientists who have done the studies, they would try to get them fired, they’d try to get their funding taken away or they would accuse them of fraud. When that didn’t work they hired other scientists who knew nothing about the field to do studies that looked like they were replicating the other studies but they really weren't. And when all of those things failed, they wrote a memo in which they said if the cellular industry has done its job we think we war-gamed the science. That’s a quote - ‘war-gamed’ the science. Now science is not a matter of war, and it’s not a matter of games; we’re deadly serious about our health and that of our children.

RT: War-gaming, reveals this leaked Motorola document, is industry paid studies purely for reassuring the public.

Norman Sandler, Motorola: We have sufficiently war-gamed the issue.

RT: A sting has exposed how easy to get phoney studies in print. Posing as a serious scientist, John Bohannon sent in a paper full of schoolboy errors, offering payment for publication. Incredibly more than half the journals in these countries all around the world published it, even lying to the public that the study had been peer reviewed.

Investigative journalist Anthony Gucciardi has broken numerous health scandals, great to see you. Surely big business wouldn't fake studies to put millions of lives at risk. Do we have documented precedents?

Anthony Gucciardi, Storyleak editor: This is exactly like Eli Lilly which in the 1980s knew that Prozac was leading to suicides and aggressive behavior, the exact opposite effect of what they wanted. They knew that in the 1980s after they conducted the research. They hid the research and it wasn’t exposed until 2005 from the BBC. But then they would have their corporate interests do studies and talk about how great it was. Now of course they’re required to admit that antidepressants do cause suicide, aggressive behavior, pretty much every shooter is on them.

When these cell phone companies are forced to admit that cell phone radiation does cause brain tumors, that it does do all this, and they’re already saying this in their manuals, so it’s already coming up. But once the public is aware of this fact, it will be even worse than antidepressants, it will be even worse than tobacco.

RT: We invited the powerful phone industry lobby CTIA to discuss the issues raised in this report. They sent a one-line refusal.

CTIA phone industry lobby: Thank you for contacting us, but we will not be able to do this interview.

RT: The industry's most respected journalist is Dr. Louis Slesin, editor of Microwave News since 1981. Louis, great to speak to you, there seems to be a parallel universe of what the industry says and everyone else.

Dr. Louis Slesin, Microwave News editor: The whole system is broken. People are not being told the truth, it's crazy. You know it's easy to say we made a mistake on tobacco after we know that tobacco’s a killer. The point is to take action.

RT: Action IS being taken outside the US. France is moving schools back from Wi-Fi to cabled Internet. Countries from Germany to Israel and Finland are moving to stop cell phone sales to kids. But Obama just made industry chief lobbyist Thomas Wheeler head of the regulator itself, the FCC. A former administration official calls it another astonishing conflict of interest. So doctors who want parents at least informed of cell phone dangers to their kids say they aren't holding their breath. (http://mieuxprevenir.blogspot.com/2014/08/the-correlation-between-cell-phone-use.html).

Tim Ferris made an awesome discovery in his book, The 4-Hour Body ...

"Most of the studies performed in the US that conclude no negative effect are funded either directly or indirectly (as with many IEEE studies) by cell phone manufacturers and carriers. Does this prove malfeasance? No, but it should raise a red flag." (http://mieuxprevenir.blogspot.com/2014/08/the-correlation-between-cell-phone-use.html).

"...Tim first started researching the correlation between low sperm count and cell phone use because he went and got a sperm count test, and found out that his numbers were surprisingly low.
"The lab results, which were available the afternoon after my session, put my sperm count on the low range of normal, borderline problematic. I couldn't believe it. Assuming it was a lab mistake, I repeated the drill 3 weeks later and came back with an even lower count. The more tests I did over the next 12 months, the lower the results."

               After Tim started researching the effects of cell phone use on sperm count, he realized that for years, he'd been carrying a cell phone in his pocket for about 12 hours per day, most days of the week. So he decided to do a test...
               For 11 weeks, Tim decided that he would no longer carry his cell phone in his pocket... or as he puts it "my phone was no longer allowed to cuddle with my testicles".
               Instead, he kept the phone on the other side of the room if working at home, or if he had to go somewhere, he kept his phone either strapped to his arm with an iPod armband, or in a backpack pocket. If he had to carry it in his pocket, he turned it off, and only turned it back on occasionally to check messages.
               He actually performed this test for 11 weeks for a specific reason... sperm production takes an estimated 64 days in humans... so he wanted to wait that long, plus an extra 2 weeks for buffer.

The results of the 11 week "no-cell-phone-in-the-pocket" test:
The numbers are shocking...
- Ejaculate volume: 44% increase
- Motile sperm per milliliter: 100% increase
- Motile sperm per ejaculate: 185% increase

Now Tim admits that his study wasn't perfect, as there may have been other influences that weren't accounted for, such as his diet not being exactly the same during each time period. However, he feels confident enough that these results speak for themselves.... after all, the results are pretty significant!” (http://mieuxprevenir.blogspot.com/2014/08/the-correlation-between-cell-phone-use.html)

The truth is, cell phones are not safe. They can cause cancer, ADHD, fry our brains, cause sperm count to go down, cause miscarriages with pregnant women, and the list goes on. Those are true facts, testified by real live people, and not the “experts” of the industry. What is also certain is that all of these facts have been kept hidden from us as consumers by Uncle Sam and by the industry.

The late Steve Jobs, founding father of the cell phone boom, “made it clear he had ‘no interest’ in having an app in the Apple app store which alerted iPhone users of excessive exposure to potentially cancer causing cell phone radiation. The company named Tawkon developed an application to measure the amount of radiation coming from your iPhone. Jobs wanted no part of it, in a twist of irony, it was cancer that took Steve Jobs from this world; he may have been a genius in many ways, but not in cancer prevention.

And Steve Jobs isn’t the only one that has failed to face up to the fact that cell phones kill us. The cell phone industry, the government…it’s all connected…literally. Please note the following two articles below:

            As Clinton addressed a gathering of the American Academy of Pediatrics on Sunday, Mottus let off a siren and shouted through a bullhorn in an attempt to garner attention for his crusade against microwave transmissions. He told Breitbart News in a phone interview that his exact words were:
                    ‘Wireless Classrooms cause cancer, heart arrhythmias, electro hypersensitivity, neurological disorders, immune system disorders and damage to reproduction. This is corporate and government murder, corruption, racketeering and cover up. What about [Delaware Attorney General] Beau Biden and the tumor behind his ear where he holds his cell phone? These doctors and people need to wake up--wireless is harming and killing some of us. Wireless classrooms are harming our children and government is covering it up. We need to stop our government from what they are doing. We are the wireless experiment as we are microwaving radiating our children without real safety standards. Wired not wireless classrooms.’
                    As Mottus was removed from the room, Hillary denigrated him, joking, ‘Ya know, there are some people who miss important developmental stages.’   When asked to respond to Hillary’s comment, Mottus said, "I would rather be developmentally delayed than morally corrupt spending billions to increasingly exposing people to wireless technology that causes cancer, reproductive harm, and other serious disease. This is corporate and government murder and corruption and the federal government has a long history of covering up wireless health effects.
(http://mieuxprevenir.blogspot.com/2014/10/hillary-clinton-heckler-hits-back-id.html)

I think the more we look into this, it is safe to conclude that Uncle Sam is involved in the cell phone industry…

“…law enforcement increasingly relies on information gathered from those phones to investigate crimes. A victim or suspect’s mobile phone records can tell police who they’ve been speaking to or texting with accurate time stamps. Some records also CAN TRACK the location of the call or text.

“in 2011, law enforcement agencies made more than 1.3 million requests for customer cell phone records, according to a new Congressional report. Verizon says these requests have increased about 15 percent annually since 2007.” (Larry Greenemier. July 12, 2012)

Government involvement? I’d say that’s an understatement. But don’t ask me, all you have to do is go to the school where your child attends and realize that the radiation levels are thousands above safe radiation levels. (See Ariel Policano's videos.) With the new, US government curriculum Common Core now, wireless has been installed…my Mom is a public school teacher. When she steps inside the classroom, they aren’t what they used to be. Kids are doing “school” on tablets…most students have few or NO books. In some classes, the books are only for the teachers, or locked away so students only have limited access. Sure, there are books in the library, but no books for the students. Amazing? Worse than that. Deathly frightening.

If you have any doubt that the government is involved, all you have to do is walk through the doorway of your child’s classroom. Each tablet is emitting a microwave radiation that is cooking your child’s brain. Wonder why there’s such trouble concentrating? Is ADHD any wonder? We need to be aware that we aren’t in Kansas anymore. We’re in Oz, and the Wizard is hiding the truth behind the cloak of "the experts", "government research", "education", (the Common Core & the Wi-Fi plan). Yes, the truth may be shocking, so shocking that it may even sound stupid or crazy.

But what makes more sense? The government isn’t hiding anything from you and cell phones are perfectly safe, and all the increased numbers in cancer deaths and tumors on the same side of the head where the victim held the phone are simply phony and the victims of cancer just need to get over it?!

Or could it be possible that the government is continually, deliberately denying all the evidence that shows that human beings are being effected by these electrical forces? I mean, each one of us is an electrical force…think about it.

What’s in it for the Wizard? Why all the lies & cover-ups by the U.S. Government? Wasn't the government supposed to have our best interest in mind? Wasn't the government made "for the people, & by the people?" (according to the Declaration of Independence.) Why would they lie to us at the cost of our health & even...our lives?

Here’s some reasons why the government is lying to us…

1) One dollar of every six that you spend on your cell phone bill,

2) A distracted, mostly ignorant population of citizens that can be more easily brainwashed & not think about the most important things, the things that truly matter in life.

3) Less people to deal with, (think about it...)

4) Only the elite, are the ones that will be alive in America…because they knew that cell phones are dangerous and they took the precautions.

When I began this research paper, my goal was to reveal truth on the long-term effects on cell phone usage, and the possibility that the government is hiding that truth from us as American citizens.

I strongly believe we have come to the solid conclusion that there is much at stake if we don't know what is really behind the curtain, and don't take precautionary steps to protect our bodies immediately.

Your life, the lives of your future children, will be affected…forever.

You have so much to lose if you don't take action. And don't take my word for it. Read all the cases of the individuals that have suffered from cancer caused by cell phone usage; not the controlled agendas that the U.S. Government & the cell phone industry are posting on the internet as “fact”.

Cell phones are killing us very subtlety & slowly and you and I must take immediate action to minimize our exposure to the radiation.

Because if you don't take action today…there will be…a too late.

Reference Page

1) Larry Greenemier. July 12th, 2012

2) Meris/ "Hillary Clinton Heckler Hits Back: 'I'd Rather Be Developmentally Delayed Than Morally Corrupt" 2a)(http://mieuxprevenir.blogspot.com/2014/10/hillary-clinton-heckler-hits-back-id.html)

2b)(http://mieuxprevenir.blogspot.com/2014/08/the-correlation-between-cell-phone-use.html)

2c)(http://mieuxprevenir.blogspot.com/2014/01/unequivocal-cell-phones-cause-cancer.html)

3) Senior Editor Jacob Sullom/"Smokescreen: The Truth Behind the Tobacco Industry Cover-Up."

(http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Smokescreen%3a+The+Truth+Behind+the+Tobacco+Industry+Cover-Up.-a019030080)

4) Shelagh McNally/"Is there a cell phone cover-up?"

(http://www.greenlivingonline.com/article/there-cell-phone-cover)

5) Dr. Gordon/